The Problem with Literary Slut Shaming


By K. A. Laity

Because women don't write anything important, right?

Shocking revelations this week—or at least that's how it was presented. WNEP in Snyder Country, Pennsylvania ran a story with the deliberately provocative headline, "Parents: English Teacher Writes Racy Novels" as a way to manufacture controversy. Like the Simpsons' Helen Lovejoy shrieking, "Won't somebody please think of the children?" the local news station began their "news" story with the following slut-shaming gasp:

A series of racy romance novels by an author named Judy Mays are a little too racy for some parents in our area, especially now that they have discovered the woman known as Judy Mays is teaching their children.

You can hear the ominous chords that accompany such a declaration as "the woman known as" which has the familiar ring of a true crime show. And how did those parents "discover" this fact? By having the news station contact them and tell them so? The rhetoric of this piece makes plain their attempt to shame the author with insinuations and comments like, "A photograph of Buranich matches a YouTube interview in which she talks about her novels." At the top of the piece appears her teacher photo next to a slightly blurry screen capture from the video. One parent said, "The evidence is clear...I think she needs to make a decision as to what she wants to do. Either be a school teacher or author."

Evidence? What crime is she supposed to have committed? Writing and publishing books—who'd have imagined an English teacher might write books?! Shock, horror. Are all other teachers also required to abstain from having or mentioning sex? It might be dismissed as Puritanism gone mad in a cultural backwater, but it's part of a larger phenomenon.

Feminist scholar and author Joanna Russ, who just passed away this week, wrote an insightful study How to Suppress Women's Writing. In it she suggests that outright prohibition would never work because that only spurs rebellion, but if you want to suppress women's (or any other "undesirable" group's) literature, the thing to do is "develop various strategies for ignoring, condemning, or belittling the artistic works."

This is precisely what's being done to Judy Mays. It's the same kind of phenomenon that Jennifer Weiner tried to highlight with the "Franzenfreude" meme and the same thing that makes sure that self-promoting blowhard males get more attention than anyone else (including males who find it unappealing to be self-promoting blow-hards). It's why the mere mention of the romance genre provokes snickers (unless you're Nicholas Sparks who does not write romance novels) and why films that have women as the main attraction are dismissed as "chick flicks" while Movies Without Women are just called movies.

Joanna Russ, why did you leave us so soon?

K. A. Laity writes so much that she had to create some pseudonyms to keep her colleagues from thoughts of murder. A tenured medievalist at a small liberal arts college, she mostly tries to find ways to avoid meetings in order to write more . Find her on Facebook or follow her on Twitter where she shamelessly self-promotes albeit in a dignified and tasteful manner.

POSTED IN: CULTURE
Thu, 05 May 2011 11:26 (GMT+01)
8 Responses
1.

In a timely manner: Publishers Weekly also gets on the story:
http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/beyondherbook/?p=3772

K. A. Laity
Thu, 05-May-2011 12:22 GMT
2.

And I completely forgot to mention her fabulous former student's support video for her: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8gqyq-NRSE

K. A. Laity
Thu, 05-May-2011 12:27 GMT
3.

It's a disgusting example of another way to persecute women for being true to themselves. Just like all the horrible labels they slap on women for having affairs, or enjoying their own sexuality, here's another way to keep us in our little fish bowls. And what if Judy was a pseudonym for Jeff Larson? Then bravo! would be heard for his incredible ability to reach into his feminine side and write such compelling literature. Makes me sick to my stomach.

Margie Church
Thu, 05-May-2011 13:09 GMT
4.

I completely agree, Margie! I'm really gratified by the reaction of romance writers to rally around her, because we all get the same crap attitude. It's good to hear that the majority of parents and students think she's to be congratulated, not shamed. Maybe change is ever so slowly happening. Just not fast enough to suit me!

K. A. Laity
Thu, 05-May-2011 13:29 GMT
5.

Well, I don't think this is a case of She Doesn't Write Anything Important, so much as LOOK AT THE HORROR OF HER WRITING EROTICA! The schoolmarm has been seen in company of men! Pennsylvania has an unfortunate tendency, even by the standards of the US, to elevate to positions of some authority (even if that authority is a privately-owned broadcast "news" source) idiots, such as the local prosecutor who was busily and proudly attempting to put "sexting" teens who sent swimwear photos of themselves to each other in jail as traffickers in child porn. I am glad that actually sane people are speaking up for the teacher...the shame, of course, being that anyone would attempt to frame her for the "offense" of writing fiction.

Todd Mason
Thu, 05-May-2011 15:50 GMT
6.

I was trying to take this instance and connect it to overall scheme that Russ detailed, but yeah -- that's what it is, all right. The sad thing of course is that PA is not an isolated source of this kind of idiocy.

K. A. Laity
Thu, 05-May-2011 16:15 GMT
7.

Ack. That kind of thing almost puts me off offering to take part in the 'What I Write When I'm Not at the Day Job' series of articles for my medical writing association.

On the other hand, the support she got from the majority of parents, students, etc is massively encouraging.

Stevie Carroll
Fri, 06-May-2011 05:54 GMT
8.

I would think medical writers are a little more knowledgeable about the physical side of life, but I could be mistaken.

K. A. Laity
Mon, 09-May-2011 01:35 GMT

Sorry, Comments have been disabled. Read Why

The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

BITCHBUZZ IS CLOSING!
Friday 18th Jan 2013 is the last day BitchBuzz will be updated, this site now serves only as an archive.
read more...

search