Why I'm Ready for Amy Pond to Leave Doctor Who


By Cate Sevilla

I've been dreading tomorrow since the 3rd of April, 2010.

The 3rd of April marked the debut of Matt Smith and Karen Gillan as our new Doctor and his Companion in series five of Doctor Who, and the minute the ginger-haired Amelia Pond came on screen, I didn't want to lose her. 

[WARNING: If you're watching earlier episodes of Doctor Who and you're not on series seven yet - in the words of River Song - SPOILERS!]

We had been put through the paces with Russell T Davies at the helm of Doctor Who. We lost Rose (twice) in the most heart wrenching ways possible. Admittedly, saying goodbye to Martha wasn't all that hard, but when Donna Noble had to forget everything, we cried. We had lost the most brilliant, hilarious woman to ever step foot on the TARDIS.

We then watched as the Doctor roamed the Universe on his own. He saved it on his own, too, and it cost him his 11th regeneration. We had that freckly, gangly "long streak of alien nothing" that was David Tennant slowly ripped out of our lives over the course of a year and four episodes, and when he stood in the control room of the TARDIS one last time, softly whispering that he didn't want to go, we echoed his plea.

Please don't go. How could we ever fall in love with another Doctor?

But, when Matt Smith came barreling onto our screens with his ridiculous chin, huge hair, bow ties, fish fingers and custard - we begrudgingly accepted him. He's (still) growing on us. He lacks the magic and intensity of Tennant, but I've come to accept that we'll never have someone like DT on the series again. 

Steven Moffat has proved to be kinder to his viewers. We don't have the drama, cliffhangers or heartbreak that we saw in "Journeys End" or "Turn Left",  but we seem to have lost something along the way: a strong, diverse, dynamic companion that grows and matures with the Doctor, through darkness and light, pasts and futures.

As entranced as I was with Amy Pond in series six, and as much a I love her awkward stance, fire-red hair and quips at "Stupid Face" Rory, the writers of Doctor Who have let her down, and she never developed out of her initial role as a plot device, and into a fully developed character. 

The Purpose of Amy Pond

Companions of Doctor Who past have all grown in some way. We watched Rose go from a scrappy teenager who worked in a shop, to a powerful, strong, mature Bad Wolf who traveled the stars, saved the world, as well as saving the Doctor from himself. 

Martha decided to give up chasing the Doctor, become a Doctor herself, save the world a few times and find a man of her own. Donna went from being a "temp! From Chiswick!" to became Doctor Donna and the most important woman in all of creation. River Song has transformed into perhaps one of the strongest female characters in the history of the show, and even Rory has grown tremendously - despite his five deaths.

But Amy?

She was named "Pond" for a reason and served her purpose as River Song's mother. Amy, rather alarmingly, quickly got over the fact that she was kidnapped and had her child taken from her, just as she quickly got over the Doctor dropping her off into the real world, forcing her to find work as a model, and then eventually a travel journalist. 

Not Doctor Donna. Not a member of Torchwood or UNIT. A sometimes-model turned freelance journalist. 

Series seven of Doctor Who has been such a let-down for Amy Pond, and I blame Chris Chibnall and Steven Moffat for this. Amy goes from being a stroppy model on the verge of divorce, to a homebody and alleged journalist who does little more in The Power of Three than make funny faces and run around without purpose - simply because they haven't given her another one.

Goodbye, Pond

When Rory and Amy do make the decision to stop jumping in and out of their normal timelines to travel with the Doctor, we see Rory working in his hospital as a nurse. His manager says to him that he's really valued at the hospital, he saves lives and they want him to work full-time. And Amy?

She's asked to be a bridesmaid at a lesbian wedding, and says yes.

1) I'm bored of all the lazy attempts at being queer-friendly by the writing team at DW.

2) Rory wants to save lives, and she gives up all of time and space TO BE A FUCKING BRIDESMAID.

Are those really Amelia Pond's values? THAT is what she'd give up her raggedy man for? Are you effing kidding me?!

Where is the Amy Pond who wore an eye drive and killed off Madame Kavarian? Is Amy not angry? Is she not frustrated? Is she not just as jaded as the Doctor from her losses? Why can she not have the same depth that River Song has? That Rose had?

As much as I have dreaded this day, the goodbye to both Rory and Amy Pond - it's time. I am happy to see them go, instead of going on as they have. We don't need to see Amy spin in circles any more - it's time for her to go. No more of this silly plot where Rory's dad is so accepting of the Doctor and his crazy world with dinosaurs on spaceships and tiny black, killer cubes. No more of this Pond Life, and the completley fabricated suspense surrounding Amy and Rory's decision to leave the Doctor. Just let them go.

Surprisingly, I actually can't wait for the (re)entrance of the Doctor's next companion, Jenna-Louise Coleman.

I hope that Moffat and his team once again give us a companion with a purpose, and a character that serves as something bigger than a plot device who never even got her own set of TARDIS keys. 

Out with the old, and in with the new. Such is the way of time. 

POSTED IN: CULTURE
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:00 (GMT+01)
7 Responses
1.

More feminist bullshit. Get back in the kitchen and make a hit sci-fi show! If you can.

Michael
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 10:21 GMT
2.

What a lovely eloquent comment there, from Michael. Makes me wonder why he's reading a site like this in the first place.

Anyway... I have to say I completely agree with you about Amy. She's just not developed as a character, despite all the massive life-changing things that have happened to her. I really hope the show gets a new lease of life with the next companion, as this series has been rather lacklustre so far :-(

Lori Smith
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 10:45 GMT
3.

Couldn't agree more, Amy and River Song are two strong female characters that both had the chance to be developed far more than they have. Whilst I'll be sad to see Amy go, if they aren't going to developer her character properly, then it's probably for the best.

It was so promising as well.

Gordon
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 10:47 GMT
4.

I really liked Amy (and loved Rory) to begin with but now I feel like something has drastically changed and Amy isn't a nice person any more. Yeah, shit got weird but it feels like things are being rushed to write them out.

From what I've seen of the new companion, I like that she's a genius. We need more insanely clever women on our screens. However, I don't know if I'm going to like her. I suppose I'm always wary of new companions.

Bring back Donna.
*sob*

Jet
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 11:04 GMT
5.

Excellent post.

I've actually given up on the show now as momentum is lacking in quite a few areas - and one of the most obvious ones is just not having a clue what to do with Amy. It really shows that somewhere along the line they forgot to give her a consistent, developing personality.

Lori... obvious troll is obvious, right? :)

Alex
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 11:04 GMT
6.

I love this show, and I even love Amy Pond, but I've never been satisfied with the way Moffat develops female characters. Even River Song's growth over the last series didn't feel like real growth as much as convenient plot finagling.

Sarah McBride
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 11:48 GMT
7.

Thank you all for your comments! (Except Michael, who can suck it.)

Agree that this series has been a let down and that even River (who is missing from this series so far, except for the next episode) hasn't been developed much more since we found out who she was.

Here's home JLC will be treated better...

x

Cate
Fri, 28-Sep-2012 15:37 GMT

Sorry, Comments have been disabled. Read Why

The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

BITCHBUZZ IS CLOSING!
Friday 18th Jan 2013 is the last day BitchBuzz will be updated, this site now serves only as an archive.
read more...

search